Population, Environment And Poverty

What is a greater wonder is whether morals were the cause of all this (that is to say, to speak and think that morals are the main cause of such behavior around the world and such factual existence): whether over population and poverty means needs that people are unable to relinquish who find difficulty getting themselves on the path of a good (if not the best) future or environmental imbalance, they are both the cause of the fact of immorality, not over population, for many people of good ethics could make a proper balance of the Earth as many bad people could do it counter wise.

Was it true that over population was the cause of the imbalance of the distribution of earth materials by Man? If population growth is often portrayed as causing poverty and environmental degradation, then how is it possible that ethics and morals of those who work and procreate to have no effect on global earth resources and environment -only reside to a cause which seems not reasonable enough (and secondary) to be a cause of degradation: the increasing number of people on earth? Where has the view of people's morals who procreate gone in the measurement of the imbalance caused by this over population? Is it not the cause of the increase of immorality between people, ill-education on how to save the Earth and ill morality on how to act towards one another and help each other?

In poor countries the skills to live are poorer but only because the fact that the minority in power controls over 70-85% of the resources of the countries by force (by gun force) and the majority would not find everyday source of food if they do not join the forces with the militias, etc to be able to live with dignity. Also, environmentally, such unbalance in behavior reflects on the material of the mind that causes to misuse the resources of earth (oil, water, woods, soil good for plantation, etc) to the benefit of the illegitimate power and also the least properly thinking, although it is against conscience, yet those people have had lots of piling up of indifference to the heart's balance of emotions, such acts are verified by those who follow it due to the fact that need the food and water provided by those who own it and the income that provides such facilities. This varies greatly from hard core belief that this is proper to forcing upon themselves to believe that this is what they should do to survive (right or wrong be it for necessity provides acceptance of unacceptable means).

Skilled people to survive and remain alive lack the human factor of people who want to be true in their friendship or knowledge of other people (nobody said you must give up all you have got from money and materials to let others live, but the percentage that still could help on other person to live a day with dignity). Poverty is not the issue, morals are. With the increase in the number of people who are immoral towards what being humane means and what living as a human on this earth means and also what having children surviving this world without complications from other, is not what is on the minds of people who live. Thoughts vary and meanly develop because everyone ,mostly, depends on common sense to logic, whether due to poor education or because of lack of ingenuity of thoughts, or because they have seen and have experienced what could cause a shut down of creativity of thinking and planning the future with depressions due to the facts surrounding them. Is it misuse of free will given by God or the Supernatural? It seems to be the case, also, depending on how people use knowledge for thinking of profits and ability to maintain richness and sustain it even if it means biting in those close to you. This point clarified, environmental unbalances are due to the same cause, the results equate to those that occur and produce poverty produce environmental changes in the planet.

The imbalance in environment is caused by misbehavior of people who have resources and do not use it in an environmentally friendly way. What causes the balance to become upset is the fact that every person who studies does so for the monetary factor without regard to the fact that the resource could be badly injured by the user and does or could not reach those who are in need of it (properly). The fact is, over population is not a bad thing if people who are able to help and capable of helping could share their experiences in making the world better. Lots of problems exist: the people who have power and resources are lesser in percentage and ill-cooperative compared to those who do not own as much and are more willing to give. So is it a matter of unbalanced distribution of goods in the world? Yes, between people who have and people who do not have the necessary ethics to overcome globally and unanimously the problems facing the world.

Poverty and environment are but results, the factor is morals of the world. Can spiritual beliefs and good breeding change the world? Yes, even the universe.

Sustainable Living Articles @ http://www.articlegarden.com 

Please Rate The Above Article From The Sustainability Category
Title: Population, Environment And Poverty

5 out of 54 out of 53 out of 52 out of 51 out of 5 
# of Ratings = 1 | Rating = 1/5

AUTHORS! Bookmark This Article to del.icio.us

Email to Friends

Copy & Paste html for your website or blog